I believe that it is legitimate, but it has nothing to do with me. I didn't use any of fertilizers or pesticides, plus I have experienced many Parkinson's symptoms since childhood.
September 5
The lawsuits are likely referring to Chlorpyrifos (sold under the brand name Dursban) and possibly Paraquat — both pesticides that have been scientifically linked to an increased risk of Parkinson's disease. So yes, there is legitimate research backing these concerns.
Research has consistently found a connection between Show Full Answer
The lawsuits are likely referring to Chlorpyrifos (sold under the brand name Dursban) and possibly Paraquat — both pesticides that have been scientifically linked to an increased risk of Parkinson's disease. So yes, there is legitimate research backing these concerns.
Research has consistently found a connection between certain pesticides and Parkinson's. The most commonly linked ones include:
- Paraquat — people exposed to it were 2.5 times more likely to develop Parkinson's
- Rotenone — often marketed as "natural" but linked to Parkinson's risk
- Organophosphorus chemicals — including Chlorpyrifos (Dursban), which increased PD likelihood by nearly 47%
- Agent Orange — a chemical mixture used in the Vietnam and Korean wars It's thought that pesticide exposure alone doesn't directly cause Parkinson's in everyone. Rather, people with a genetic susceptibility may be more vulnerable, and pesticide exposure can act as a trigger.
If there's been past exposure to any of these chemicals, speaking with a neurologist and potentially a legal professional about options would be worthwhile steps to consider.
September 5
Join
Your Privacy Choices
